Knostic vs. Microsoft Purview: Choosing the Right AI Governance Platform in 2026

Knostic Overview: Knowledge-Layer Security for Enterprise AI

Knostic is a knowledge-layer security platform purpose-built for the realities of enterprise AI adoption. Rather than governing raw files or infrastructure alone, Knostic focuses on what users and AI assistants can know and how that knowledge is inferred, summarized, and redistributed by large language models (LLMs).

Knostic is mainly designed to address a problem traditional data governance tools were not built for: semantic oversharing. In modern AI workflows, assistants like Microsoft Copilot and other LLM-powered tools can surface insights from multiple documents, repositories, and conversations that a user may not have explicitly opened. 

Knostic evaluates these interactions at the knowledge and inference level, determining whether the meaning of information being revealed is appropriate for a given user, role, or context. The platform applies need-to-know–based controls to AI responses, dynamically constraining what an LLM can reveal. 

It applies these constraints even when the underlying data sources are technically accessible. This allows enterprises to reduce AI-driven exposure without re-architecting file permissions or over-restricting collaboration.

Knostic is typically deployed as an AI-native security layer, complementing existing identity, access, and compliance systems. Its value is strongest in environments where generative AI amplifies legacy oversharing.

Microsoft Purview Overview: Compliance and Data Governance Across Microsoft 365

Microsoft Purview is Microsoft’s unified compliance, data governance, and risk management platform for Microsoft 365 and connected services. It helps enterprises understand where data resides, how it is classified, and whether it is being handled in line with regulatory, legal, and internal requirements.

Purview focuses on data discovery, classification, and policy enforcement. Organizations use it to apply sensitivity labels, retention policies, and compliance controls across SharePoint, OneDrive, Exchange, and Teams. These capabilities support core governance use cases such as eDiscovery, audit readiness, records management, and regulatory reporting.

In generative AI environments, Purview functions as the system of record for data classification and access. Labels, information protection policies, and permissions defined in Purview determine what data AI assistants like Microsoft Copilot are allowed to retrieve from Microsoft 365 services.

Purview’s governance model operates at the data and metadata layer, enforcing controls based on files, labels, and access rights. Its primary strength is establishing consistent, Microsoft-native compliance foundations, rather than governing how AI systems infer, combine, or contextualize information at response time.

For organizations standardized on Microsoft 365, Purview provides essential baseline governance that many AI security strategies rely on.

Knostic vs. Purview: Core Architectural Differences

While both platforms are used in enterprise AI environments, Knostic and Microsoft Purview are built on fundamentally different architectural assumptions. These differences explain why they address distinct but increasingly connected AI governance problems.

1. What Each Platform Governs

Purview governs data assets and compliance posture. Its controls are applied to files, messages, and records within Microsoft 365, with policies tied to classification, retention, and access.

Knostic governs knowledge exposure. It focuses on what AI assistants reveal to users, even when that knowledge is derived from multiple underlying sources rather than a single file or record.

2. Static Controls vs. AI Inference Risk

Purview enforces policies based on predefined rules associated with labels, locations, and permissions that exist before an AI interaction occurs. These controls remain consistent regardless of how AI synthesizes information.

Knostic evaluates inference-time risk, assessing whether an AI-generated response reveals sensitive meaning or insight that exceeds a user’s need to know.

3. Labels and DLP vs. Semantic Oversharing Detection

Purview relies on labels and DLP controls, enforcing policies based on predefined data types, sensitivity metadata, and locations. These controls work well for managing known compliance boundaries across files and messages.

Knostic detects semantic oversharing, identifying when AI responses infer or reconstruct sensitive knowledge from context, even when no label or DLP rule is directly triggered.

4. Governance System vs. AI Security Layer

Purview functions as a governance system of record, anchoring compliance, audit, and regulatory workflows across Microsoft environments.

Knostic functions as an AI security layer, designed to sit above existing governance tools and constrain AI behavior without altering underlying data controls.

5. Where Each Fits in the Stack

Purview is foundational for organizations standardizing governance across Microsoft 365.

Knostic is additive, addressing AI-specific exposure that emerges once assistants, copilots, and agents begin actively interpreting and redistributing enterprise knowledge.

Together, these architectural differences clarify why the platforms are often compared and why they are frequently deployed together rather than as replacements.

Side-by-Side Platform Comparison: Knostic vs. Purview

The table below summarizes how Knostic and Microsoft Purview compare across key dimensions that matter for enterprise AI governance. Rather than duplicating earlier explanations, this view highlights practical differences in scope, focus, and operational impact.

‍

How Knostic and Microsoft Purview Work Together

Knostic and Microsoft Purview are often used together because they govern different layers of AI risk. 

Purview as the System of Record

Microsoft Purview acts as the system of record for data classification, retention, and access across Microsoft 365. Sensitivity labels, permissions, and compliance policies defined in Purview establish the baseline controls that determine what data users and services are allowed to access.

Knostic as the AI Governance Overlay

Knostic operates on top of this foundation, focusing on how AI assistants interpret and surface information. It does not replace Purview’s labels or policies, but instead applies additional governance at the knowledge layer to constrain what AI systems can reveal.

Closing Semantic Gaps in Copilot Security

When Copilot synthesizes information across multiple sources, sensitive insights may emerge without violating any single label or permission. In these cases, Purview enforces access rules, while Knostic addresses semantic exposure in AI-generated responses.

Policy Feedback and Remediation Workflows

Together, the platforms create a feedback loop: Purview defines compliance intent, and Knostic highlights AI-driven exposure that may signal overbroad access or legacy oversharing. This allows teams to refine governance without disrupting collaboration.

When to Choose Knostic vs Purview: Common Use Cases

Choosing between Knostic and Microsoft Purview depends on which layer of AI risk you are trying to control.

• If You Need Microsoft-Native Compliance Controls: Organizations prioritizing regulatory compliance, retention, eDiscovery, and auditability across Microsoft 365 should lead with Microsoft Purview. It is best suited for governing data at rest through standardized classification and policy enforcement.
  
• If You Need AI Oversharing and Copilot Risk Detection: Enterprises concerned about AI assistants surfacing sensitive insights through summarization or cross-document reasoning benefit from Knostic. This is especially relevant when Copilot use expands the blast radius of legacy oversharing.
  
• If You’re Building an AI Governance Layer Beyond Labels: When labels and DLP controls already exist but AI inference still creates exposure, Knostic adds governance focused on knowledge-level risk rather than file access alone.
  
• If You Need Both Working Together: Many Microsoft-centric enterprises deploy Purview for baseline governance and Knostic to address AI-specific gaps introduced by assistants and agents.

Ultimately, the decision reflects whether the primary challenge is governing data or governing AI-driven knowledge exposure.

Pros and Cons of Knostic and Microsoft Purview

The table below summarizes the practical strengths and limitations of each platform, based on its intended role in enterprise AI governance. This section avoids restating earlier architectural differences and focuses on operational tradeoffs.

‍

Where Opsin Security Fits in AI Agent and Copilot Protection

Opsin Security sits above data governance and AI governance platforms, enabling organizations to monitor, audit, and enforce AI usage policies for AI assistants, copilots, and agents in production environments.

• Securing AI Agents Beyond Data Governance: Opsin focuses on file-, access-, and identity-level exposure that AI systems amplify. It discovers overshared data, excessive permissions, and agent sprawl (including Copilot Studio agents and custom GPTs) that inherit broad access and operate outside traditional visibility.
• Real-Time Controls for AI Actions and Access: Rather than relying on periodic reviews, Opsin delivers continuous monitoring of AI activity, including prompts, uploads, and AI queries. It detects risky behavior as it happens and guides remediation when AI systems surface or propagate sensitive enterprise data.
• Unified Enforcement Across SaaS and AI Workflows: Opsin applies consistent enforcement across Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and AI assistants, helping teams reduce exposure without disrupting collaboration or changing how users work.
• Operational AI Security for Enterprise Adoption: By translating governance intent into real-time visibility and response, Opsin enables enterprises to scale Copilot and agent adoption while keeping data exposure, identity sprawl, and AI-driven oversharing under control.

Conclusion

Choosing between Knostic and Microsoft Purview depends on whether the priority is data governance or AI-driven knowledge exposure. Purview establishes Microsoft-native compliance foundations, while Knostic addresses semantic oversharing introduced by AI assistants. Opsin complements both, translating governance intent into real-time visibility and control as Copilot, agents, and enterprise AI usage scale in production environments.