
Microsoft Purview has become a core component of many enterprise data security and compliance programs, particularly for organizations deeply invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure. Its strengths lie in native integration with Microsoft workloads, built-in sensitivity labeling, and foundational information protection and compliance capabilities.
Organizations running Microsoft-centric environments can use Purview to provide a solid starting point for data classification and policy enforcement. However, as enterprises move into 2026, several limitations are becoming more apparent. Most organizations now operate across a mix of SaaS applications, non-Microsoft cloud platforms, and industry-specific systems where Purview’s visibility and control can be limited.
At the same time, the rapid adoption of generative AI has changed how data exposure occurs. AI assistants can surface, summarize, and redistribute information users never explicitly viewed, dramatically expanding the impact of existing oversharing caused by broad permissions, legacy access, and identity sprawl. As a result, many security and governance teams are evaluating alternatives that offer broader cross-platform coverage, deeper insight into access and permissions, and GenAI-aware protections focused on end-user behavior.
Below, we examine the top 8 Microsoft Purview alternatives for data security in 2026, highlighting how each platform addresses modern enterprise data and GenAI security challenges.
The Microsoft Purview alternatives below address modern enterprise data security challenges across multi-cloud environments and GenAI-enabled workflows. Each solution takes a different approach to visibility, governance, and risk reduction based on how data is accessed and used.

Opsin Security is purpose-built for enterprises facing data exposure and oversharing risks that are amplified due to the increased integration of GenAI in everyday workflows. Opsin focuses on file-, permission-, and identity-level visibility across Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Teams, and other collaboration platforms.
A key differentiator is its GenAI-aware approach. As discussed earlier, AI assistants amplify existing oversharing by surfacing data users already have access to. Opsin correlates permission structures, file metadata, sensitivity labels, and classification context to understand the level of exposure.
It continuously identifies over-permissive files, legacy access, and risky sharing paths that AI tools can exploit, and then prioritizes fixes based on business impact. Opsin also monitors end-user and agent-driven AI activity to detect when sensitive data is being surfaced or propagated beyond its intended audience.

Varonis is an automated data security platform that emphasizes data discovery and classification, data security posture management, and data access governance to reduce exposure at scale. It helps enterprises find sensitive data, understand who can access it, and continuously reduce blast radius by fixing misconfigurations and enforcing policies.
Varonis also positions AI Security as a capability, including coverage for Microsoft Copilot and ChatGPT Enterprise, with a focus on monitoring AI data access and supporting LLM data remediation. This makes it relevant for GenAI-era exposure reduction, especially when AI tools can surface data through broad or inherited access.

OneTrust helps enterprises operationalize privacy, data governance, and regulatory compliance across complex, distributed data environments. Its strength lies in connecting enterprise-wide data discovery, AI-driven classification, ownership, and purpose-based policies to ensure data is used appropriately across business, analytics, and AI initiatives.
Rather than focusing on file-level exposure or access-path analysis, OneTrust emphasizes policy-driven governance and real-time enforcement. Organizations define data use policies based on regulatory requirements, consent, purpose, and sensitivity, and translate them into enforceable controls across data platforms.
OneTrust supports AI-ready governance by governing which datasets can be used, for what purpose, and under what conditions. While it does not monitor AI-driven data surfacing in end-user tools, it provides critical guardrails for compliant AI and analytics usage.

Collibra is positioned as a unified governance stack for data and AI, built on a platform powered by active metadata. It brings together capabilities like Data Catalog, Data Governance, and Data Lineage so teams can standardize definitions, improve trust, and clarify stewardship across large, distributed data estates.
Instead of focusing on real-time end-user exposure monitoring, Collibra emphasizes governance workflows and policy execution at scale, including privacy management and data quality/observability. For access-oriented controls, Collibra Protect adds data access governance with classification and streamlined policy management across complex, multi-cloud environments.
Collibra supports responsible AI use by ensuring AI initiatives rely on well-governed, well-documented data assets, even though it does not track AI-driven data exposure directly.

Immuta specializes in policy-based data access control for modern analytics and cloud data platforms. Instead of governing files or collaboration content, Immuta operates directly within data warehouses, lakes, and analytics environments to control how data can be queried and used.
Its core capability is dynamic, attribute-based access control, allowing organizations to enforce fine-grained rules based on user identity, role, purpose, and data sensitivity. This makes Immuta particularly relevant for regulated data environments using platforms such as Snowflake, Databricks, and BigQuery.
As GenAI and analytics converge, Immuta helps limit AI-related risk by ensuring that users and AI-driven workloads can only access data explicitly permitted by policy. While it does not monitor AI-driven data surfacing in end-user tools, it plays a key role in governing what data AI systems are allowed to access.

BigID positions itself as a data security and compliance platform that delivers enterprise-scale data discovery and classification across cloud, SaaS, on-prem, and hybrid environments. Its core value is giving organizations a unified view of what data they have, where it lives, and what sensitive elements it contains, so teams can act on existing risks.
Beyond visibility, BigID emphasizes risk remediation and control: identifying security and risk issues, enabling data minimization and deletion workflows, and supporting reporting for audit and compliance needs. This makes it a strong Microsoft Purview alternative for organizations with large, distributed data estates that need consistent coverage beyond Microsoft-native services.
For GenAI initiatives, BigID also highlights AI security and governance capabilities to help teams discover and govern AI-related data and assets, and manage AI data risk, even if it’s not focused on monitoring AI-driven data surfacing inside end-user chat tools.

Nightfall focuses on preventing sensitive data exposure and exfiltration across SaaS, GenAI, and email, using an AI-native detection engine to identify regulated and confidential data (e.g., PII, financial data, source code) as it moves through modern channels.
Rather than emphasizing governance programs or permission modeling, Nightfall is built for real-time detection and response, monitoring, sharing, and transfer events, and triggering automated actions to stop leaks with fast time-to-value across the ecosystem.
For GenAI adoption, Nightfall explicitly targets “shadow AI” leakage by capturing prompts, copy/paste, and uploads into AI tools, classifying and blocking sensitive content before it leaves organizational control. It also offers Nyx, an agentic assistant in the console that helps teams investigate violations and get recommendations faster.

Securiti positions its platform as a “Data+AI” command center that combines DSPM, Sensitive Data Intelligence, and Access Intelligence to discover and classify sensitive data, understand who can access it, and reduce security and compliance risk across hybrid multicloud and SaaS environments.
Securiti.ai emphasizes centralized policy management and continuous controls across security and compliance use cases, supported by broad data discovery, cataloging, and visibility into access and risk posture.
For AI adoption, Securiti.ai extends into AI Security & Governance and Security for AI Agents and Copilots, plus Gencore capabilities like context-aware LLM firewalls to protect AI interactions (e.g., prompts, retrieval, and responses).
The comparison below summarizes how leading Microsoft Purview alternatives differ in their core capabilities, deployment models, and ideal use cases. It provides a quick way to assess which platforms align best with your data footprint, governance requirements, and GenAI risk profile.
As organizations evaluate Microsoft Purview alternatives, certain capabilities consistently emerge as critical for managing modern data risk. The features below reflect what enterprises should prioritize when securing data across multi-cloud environments and GenAI-enabled workflows.
Selecting the right Microsoft Purview alternative requires evaluating how well a platform aligns with your actual data landscape and risk profile. The criteria below help security and governance teams assess coverage, scalability, and effectiveness as GenAI increases data exposure across the enterprise.
Microsoft Purview remains a strong option for Microsoft-centric environments, but the realities of multi-cloud adoption and GenAI-driven data exposure are pushing enterprises to look beyond native tooling. The alternatives covered in this guide reflect a broader shift toward deeper access visibility, AI-aware risk detection, and actionable remediation across diverse platforms.
For organizations prioritizing the reduction of AI-amplified oversharing, Opsin stands out by focusing on file-, permission-, and identity-level exposure and how AI assistants operationalize existing access. By aligning the right platform to actual data sprawl and GenAI usage, enterprises can move into 2026 with a more resilient and practical data security posture.
GenAI tools surface data based on existing permissions, amplifying legacy access and oversharing rather than creating new exposure paths.
Opsin’s GenAI-aware oversharing analysis aligns with this model of AI-amplified risk.
Effective GenAI security requires understanding why data is accessible, not just that it was accessed.
Governance defines intent, but exposure reduction determines actual risk in day-to-day workflows.
Learn more about AI oversharing risks.
Opsin ranks exposure based on business impact, sensitivity, and AI exploitability, not just volume of findings.
This prioritization workflow is central to Opsin’s platform design.
Opsin reduces Copilot risk by fixing access and permissions before AI surfaces sensitive data.
Customer outcomes show this approach enables safer Copilot adoption at scale.